Last House on the Left starts
innocently enough, but by the end has degenerated into a bloody revenge
fantasy in which a nicer-than-nice middle class family shows us how
society is only a short step away from violent anarchy. The plot is
that middle class Mary of liberal upbringing and her more worldly-wise
friend Phyllis go to see a concert, try to score some drugs, get
kidnapped by a gang of sexually violent criminals - and then there's
bloody horror.
With this - his first film - Craven set the template for a genre that has now become so ingrained in
the minds of the movie-watching public, that it's hard to imagine a
time before these tropes existed. The movie is shot on grainy film
stock, often with poor lighting, indifferent cuts and stunted chemistry
between the actors - in other words trying not to look like a film,
trying to look like real life. Herein lies the true nastiness of it,
rather than trying to tell a horror story or deliberately scare us,
Craven is doing something much more animalistic than that. He's trying
to get under our skin by presenting us with youthfulness and innocence,
and then ripping it to bloody pieces.
Of course
the cleverness here is that even through this, the film is politically
charged. It plays into the fear of every liberal parent, that their
liberalism contradicts that animal instinct to protects one's children
above all, and that one's civilised exterior is only a front waiting to
be washed away to reveal the darkness underneath. When presented with
something of unimaginable horror, such as the people who brutally killed
your daughter, where will our civilisation go? Who are the 'good guys'
in the film - do we applaud the revenge of a murdered daughter, or do
we shake our heads at the senselessness?
Looking
back, it's a film that has been bettered by film-nasties since, but as a
piece of film history it's clearly still relevant and seeing the
opening shots of a genre that continues to draw huge audience appeal.
No comments:
Post a Comment