A film that came out last year with a pretty decent cast,
Lawless is the latest in a long line of films of 2012 that I missed
because I've got much more into playing online computer games in the
last 12 months. The film tells the story of the Bondurant brothers, who were
bootleggers in Virginia during the prohibition era of the early 1920s.
They ran a rural bootlegging empire that competed with the big boys of
the major US cities and appeared to be largely ignored by the
authorities because of its small-time and relatively unviolent nature.
That is until the uncompromising big city fed Charlie Rakes gets
involved (Guy Pierce), who makes it a personal mission to take the
brothers down.
I said that Lawless has a 'pretty decent' cast,
and while the inclusion of Gary Oldman, Guy Pierce and Jessica Chastain
gives a healthy heap of gravitas to proceedings, the problem is that
they don't really get to do a lot. Instead we have Shia LaBeouf and Tom
Hardy (aka Bane) going full redneck as they run around the dusty scenery
shooting guns, fighting with small-time criminals and buying off the
cops. I've not been impressed by LaBeouf's acting to date, and though it
would be harsh to judge Hardy by the incomprehensibility of Bane in
Dark Knight rises, his character here rarely gets out of a rough
rumbling gurgle of speech. Maybe that all he can do? What I'm saying
here is that I felt a little cheated out of what was a potentially
brilliant cast. Gary Oldman stands around looking menacing for a bit
but has literally no impact on the story, Guy Pierce gets to be all evil
- but it's nothing more than cardboard cut-out 2D evil - and Jessica
Chastain just stands around cleaning glasses and looking angelic. It's a serious waste of talent.
There's not much more that gets on my wick in
films than female characters who are there for window dressing. Here
our lady characters are played by Chastain and Mia Wasikowska
(she was Alice in Tim Burton's recent Alice in Wonderland). As I've
already said, Chastain does little more than have big eyes and white
skin and stand around representing purity. Wasikowska
plays an innocent country girl who's there to tempt LaBeouf's character
away from his family and into the non-criminal world. I guess the
point of her is to show the audience that despite being a
'master criminal', LaBeouf's character isn't actually a bad person. Rather he's a nice normal guy driven to extremes by absurd government
regulation. Fair enough, but I can't shake the feeling that both these
characters were added after the first draft of the script went through
editing, and someone said "hey, there aren't any women in the film -
better add some...". And so we end up with a couple of entirely flaky female characters, ethereal-looking creatures waiting to be rescued from
their torment by our 'heroes'.
The film gets bonus points for
being relentless in its bloody action when the action finally gets
going, there's a lot of blood and pain and general terror when people
are shooting guns at each other. This is about it though. The superb
cast is underused and the film feels like an 18-rated pantomime complete
with unrealistic characters and even an "it's behind you" moment. I'm
not upset I missed this at the cinema.
Tuesday, 12 February 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment