Thursday 19 December 2013

Hummingbird - Jason Stafam plays a hard case

Another instalment of the 'films I didn't see in the cinema cos I was being even more geeky than normal' series - Hummingbird.  It's a film which was meant to break the mould of Jason Statham's career to date, he plays a well hard geezer of possible London origin who is a bit of psychotic sometimes but has a heart of gold if only a kind-souled woman could coax it out of him.  Indeed.

The Stathe plays Joey, an ex-army soldier who is now living on the streets of London destitute with his friend Isobel after absconding from the army following some kind of terrible incident in Afghanistan.  After a short encounter with a couple of hoodlums on the street that result in Isobel being murdered, Joey stumbles into the house of a man who is out of the country for the best part of a year.  Joey decides to steal his money, clothes and identity and uses them to be a different man, using his army training as a hard-case enforcer for a Chinese human trafficker in London's underground crime network.  Hardly becoming a new man is it?  But anyway, Joey befriends a young Polish nun Christina who is working in a food kitchen.  He gives most of his money to them, but what he really wants is to take revenge against the people who killed Isobel.  Will he get his revenge on the London criminal underclass?  Or will Christina's kind heart convince him to get his revenge in a roundabout way, by helping London's street-sleepers like she does?

It's fairly derivative stuff that isn't told that well.  It presents a picture of homelessness on London's streets and post-traumatic stress in the army without really offering any ideas or solutions, rather they're an excuse to give The Stathe some crims to punch.  The opening half hour of the film is slow-burning but largely wasted, presenting us with Joey's character and hardly telling us anything about him.  Scene to scene we swing between The Stathe doing his hard man thing and crying his heart out at the humanity of it all.  It's all a tiny bit forced, as if these scenes had different writers who weren't paying enough attention to the overall arc of the film.

To be fair to Hummingbird, I've seen plenty of action movies that have a lot less heart than this.  Most Jason Statham movies fit into that category quite easily.  What Hummingbird tries to do is give you a bit of everything, but although it's sort of ok it's never really that good at any of it.  I think the film wants The Stathe's character to be sympathetic, but at the end of the film when you find out what happened in Afghanistan it kind of makes that impossible.  The film wants to be about redemption, but there isn't really any redemption and the use of a nun as a character who instigates that redemption is a bit too literal for my tastes.  The film also wants to say something about how people can change, but that gets mishandled towards the end too when it turns out The Stathe hasn't really changed at all.  Oddest of all is the character of Christina, who reveals a history of abuse at the hands of an overpowering man - yet for some reason opens up to The Stathe, yet another alpha male who's throwing ill-gotten money around.  Perhaps the idea is that she's also being redeemed from her self-imposed chastity as a nun by seeing men as people rather than beasts.  But given Joey's character I'm not really convinced that's too realistic.

Maybe I'm reading a little too much into the symbolism of this, after all Jason Statham films are supposed to be about The Stathe rushing around hitting things.  But Hummingbird is clearly trying to be something more than the average Jason Statham film so I'm going to give it a little more thought than some of his other films warrant.  Hummingbird is a good watch, but tries too hard and too unsuccessfully to be a lot more than it is.  If you were a fan of The Stathe then you should definitely check this out to see what he's doing with his career.  If you're not a fan of his, then you need to get off your high horse and check out Crank - I dare you to tell me it's not so silly it's awesome.

Friday 13 December 2013

World War Z - 3 films for the price of 1

Slowly working my way through many of the films of 2013 as they come out on DVD at the moment.  Last week I watched Brad Pitt's latest movie World War Z - in which Brad plays some sort of ex-UN special adviser guy who the military have to keep safe and then send on a daring mission to mince around the world until he stumbles upon a way of ending the zombie apocalypse.

The film starts in a way that will be strange to anyone who has ever spent much time in Glasgow, as I am reliably informed that the open scenes of zombie carnage are filmed across one of Glasgow's main squares - a city that's meant to be Philadelphia in the USA.  We see Brad Pitt with his all too perfect family stuck in traffic, then something a bit weird happens, then something very weird happens and before you know it we're in a full-on zombie chase across Glasgow / Philadelphia.

What happens next would be fairly typical for a zombie film, were it not that the film seems to be self conscious of the fact its a zombie film.  We have a scene in which Brad Pitt gets some zombie blood in his mouth, so he has to wait on the verge of killing himself in case he turns into a zombie. It's almost as if the character Brad Pitt plays has seen one too many zombie films himself, or was in a zombie apocalypse in the past and it waiting to see which 'type' of zombie apocalypse this is.  Are we in 28 Days Later or Night of the Living Dead?  It feels like the makers of the film are far too aware of the fact that they're making a zombie movie and feel the need to identify World War Z in the spectrum of zombie genre movies, establishing early on that these are fast zombies and that they have to bite you to transmit the virus (it's a virus btw).

With that opening the film starts promisingly but immediately stops you suspending your own disbelief by reminding you about all the other zombie movies you might have seen.  The second act begins with Brad Pitt and his family being whisked off on to a US warship and sent on a mission to save the world from the zombie apocalypse.  Quite why he's qualified to do this is never made clear, people make a lot of statements about how he used to be some sort of special adviser with the UN - but little more.  With this information in hand the film settles down into its mincing around phase, plenty of fluff and action sequences but nothing actually advancing the plot.  The mince involves Brad Pitt going to Korea, then Israel and then trying to go to India vaguely on the trail of a cure, but at no point during any of the journey actually doing anything to find a cure.

When Brad Pitt fails to get to India, he ends up in South Wales and we move on to part 3.  This is where the film becomes most baffling of all and it was little surprise to discover that this final act was in fact created as part of a re-shoot after the film was originally finished.  The action moves to a research facility where Malcolm Tucker is working on a cure and then Brad Pitt comes up with an idea to make that cure work.  Although at the start of the film the zombies are brutally fast whirling dervishes of death they are now shambolic Romeroesque semi-individuals who carefully check Brad Pitt out before deciding if they should eat him or not.  Mostly baffling of all is perhaps the film's dramatic change in pace from action slasher to CSI-lite drama in which no one gets killed and Brad Pitt works out how to get the MacGuffin to save his family / whole world.

This is making a film by committee at its worst.  It looks like there were three entirely different writer / director partnerships in charge of each of the three acts of World War Z.  Despite this being a pretty major criticism, scene-to-scene  World War Z is a rather enjoyable watch.  There are some good action sequences, especially when the zombie shit hits the fan in several different locations around the world, and the early-film zombies are pretty scary at times.  Plus there's loads of explosions and zombies scrambling over each other to get to people - all that good zombie movie stuff.  In the end I don't think World War Z will be remembered much long after this year's summer blockbusters have come and gone.  I suspect the film was originally conceived with good intentions that got lost when the money men and test screenings got involved.  Watch it if you like, but apart from the effects there's very little to recommend.

Tuesday 10 December 2013

More Goodfellas

My housemate suggested to me at the weekend that we need to watch Goodfellas again.  This seems unlikely given the number of times that I've seen that film, but it's possible there might be some scenes I've not yet remembered off-by-heart.  Better watch it again to check.  While I'm thinking about it here's another scene to enjoy:



"Go get your fuckin' shine box!".  Brilliant, terrifying, Joe Pesci.

At some point I'm going to do some work today...

Tuesday 3 December 2013

Suspiria - Utterly Mental

People often tell me that I'm a film buff.  I feel far from it given that I constantly find out about films I've never even heard of before.  One of those films is Susperia, mentioned by Mark Kermode in his review of Black Swan a couple of years ago and in his list of the 10 greatest gothic films in last month's Observer.  Kermode said that fans of Suspiria would see Black Swan as a rip-off, his opinion being that Suspiria one of the great films of the horror genre.  That's more than enough recommendation for me, so with the intention of eventually becoming the film buff people keep telling me I am - last Thursday evening I watched Susperia.

The first thing to establish about Suspiria is that it's utterly mental.  Jessica Parker plays Suzy Bannion, an American dancer who comes to a famous German dance school to start her ballet training.  The first time we see her is walking out of the airport terminal into a dark and stormy night, talking to a taxi driver intent on ignoring her and then arriving at the gaudily pink dance school just as a girl is fleeing in apparent hysteria.  Before the night is over, this girl will be dead, stabbed horribly and hanged by an unseen force that appears through her apartment window.  The next day Suzy begins her training at the dance school.  As the weird events and dead bodies begin to pile up, Suzy is soon drawn to the possibility that something otherworldly is going on, that the people who run the school are not all they appear.

As one reviewer on IMDB has perfectly summed Suspiria up - it's like watching a bad dream.  It's set in a world where lights and colours on walls change from shot to shot, where the laws of physics are mutable, where people stare madly out of the corners of their eyes and where sounds and incidental music are a cacophony of discordant noises.  In short - a nightmare made celluloid.  Our heroine is trapped in a world from which she cannot escape, drawn ever-closer to dark truth that every bone in her body is screaming for her to run away from.  But in this world the logic of dreams takes over, a logic that makes the horrible truth of the dance school as inevitable as Suzy's next breath.

The film starts with a murder of horrific violence that focuses on a girl being stabbed and them brutally impaled on glass.  After this we move into slightly more sedate horror territory, with the film being happy to allow its mood, sound and general weirdness to generate a sense of unease and panic in its protagonist and viewer alike.  The last 15 minutes of Suspiria is all the more shocking then as the sub-Evil Dead make up and animatronics are brought out for the final denouement.  In the end it's a film that's strangely effectively in providing scares in several different ways.  As a wannabe film buff with a penchant for the horror genre, I feel a little silly to have never even heard of Suspiria until only a few years ago.  Other horror film fans out there in the same situation as me would do well to seek it out.